Difference between revisions of "Category:Decent alternatives"

From Beywiki, the Beyblade Encyclopedia - Presented by the World Beyblade Organization
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "This category lists Beyblades that contain no top-tier parts but that could substitute them if the better parts are unavailable. Articles about these Beyblades will mention, a...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*'''This Beyblade is not a must-have, but it is nevertheless a welcomed addition to any collection'''.  
 
*'''This Beyblade is not a must-have, but it is nevertheless a welcomed addition to any collection'''.  
  
These Beys should therefore only be considered second options that are not obligatory for competitive Beyblading as opposed to the [[Category:Must-buy Beyblades | Must-buy Beyblades]].
+
These Beys should therefore only be considered second options that are not obligatory for competitive Beyblading as opposed to the [http://wiki.worldbeyblade.org/index.php/Category:Must-buy_Beyblades must-buy Beyblades].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Usefulness]]

Latest revision as of 02:34, 10 August 2013

This category lists Beyblades that contain no top-tier parts but that could substitute them if the better parts are unavailable. Articles about these Beyblades will mention, at their end:

  • This Beyblade should only be considered if a preferred alternative cannot be purchased, or for collection purposes, or;
  • This Beyblade is a welcome addition to an already well-furnished competitive collection
  • This Beyblade is not a must-have, but it is nevertheless a welcomed addition to any collection.

These Beys should therefore only be considered second options that are not obligatory for competitive Beyblading as opposed to the must-buy Beyblades.